The concept of 'rights' is something we seem to be arguing over quite a lot lately. It's easy to defend rights when they're 'our' rights.
It's much harder when they're being exercised by other people, be they immigrants, political opponents, protesters, football fans, religious minorities, trade unionists, people who don't look like us, people who don't live like us, or just people whose views make us uncomfortable.
Yet that's precisely when rights matter most. Because the true test of any freedom is not whether it protects people we like. It's whether it protects people we don't.
"Authoritarian movements are gaining ground"
The world we live in today feels full of contradictions. Technology dazzles us with its potential. We can communicate instantly across continents, access more knowledge than any previous generation, and solve problems that once seemed impossible. Yet inequality continues to widen. Authoritarian movements are gaining ground in many countries. Disinformation spreads faster than truth, and the climate crisis hangs over everything.
"To defend only the rights we personally value is to misunderstand how rights work"
The tools available to humanity have never been more powerful. The question is what we choose to do with them.
Every right we enjoy today - whether the right to speak freely, to love whom we choose, to organise, to vote, to learn, or to live without discrimination - was won through struggle. None of these rights appeared by accident. They are the legacy of countless people who challenged power, took risks, and refused to accept injustice as inevitable.
To defend only the rights we personally value is to misunderstand how rights work. Like people they do not exist in isolation; they depend on one another.
"...armour is only as strong as its weakest link"
Human rights are like a suit of social armour, forged over generations. Each right is a separate plate: freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, equality before the law, protection from persecution, access to education, democratic representation, and countless others. Linked together, they provide protection against the abuses of unchecked power.
But armour is only as strong as its weakest link.
There will always be those who look for cracks. A little discrimination here. A little censorship there. A little erosion of due process. A little scapegoating of minorities. A little weakening of democratic accountability. Each attack may seem isolated. Each may be presented as a justified exception. Yet every successful strike weakens the whole structure.
"rights are not a menu from which we can pick our favourites"
When we fail to defend the rights of others, we create vulnerabilities that eventually threaten everyone, including ourselves.
That is why defending human rights is not merely a moral obligation. It is an act of collective self-preservation.
Every act of solidarity strengthens the armour. Every challenge to injustice repairs a crack. Every defence of another person's rights helps protect our own. The freedoms we pass on to our children and grandchildren will depend on whether we are willing to defend the freedoms of people who are not like us, do not think like us, and may never agree with us.
So whatever challenges the years ahead may bring, resolve to stand up not only for the rights you cherish personally, but for the rights of others too. Stand with the marginalised, the excluded, and the silenced. Add your strength to the social armour that protects us all.
Because rights are not a menu from which we can pick our favourites. Rights are a system, and that system, like armour, only works when we defend the whole.
Because if one plate fails, eventually the sword will find us all.
Enjoyed this article?
If you found it interesting, useful, infuriating, thought-provoking, or simply worth the time it took to read, you can help keep the kettle boiling by buying me a coffee (£3).
Or, if you think it more appropriate, perhaps a pint! (£5) .
Still got the kettle on?
Browse everything I've published so far.